Definition: And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Leviticus 15:20. It’s a really tricky one and often misunderstood! Here's the explanation in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a process of impurity that happens during childbirth or after a woman has had a miscarriage. It’s about dealing with bodily fluids that are considered unholy and shouldn't be part of worship. Let’s unpack it: “And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation…” – This means "everything that is on her body during the time between pregnancy and childbirth." Think of it as a period of time where the woman is not yet fully pregnant, or perhaps after a miscarriage. "...shall be unclean:" - This is a key word. “Unclean” in this context doesn't mean dirty in a physical way. It means that these fluids are considered spiritually impure – they’re not holy enough to be used in religious rituals. "every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean." - This continues the idea of impurity. It applies to anything the woman is sitting on, like a skirt, robe, or even her body. What was happening? In ancient Israel, there were rituals and practices related to childbirth and miscarriage. These rituals involved bodily fluids – blood, semen, etc. The verse describes a process where these fluids became tainted and considered unacceptable for religious use. It’s essentially a way of regulating the sacredness of those fluids during a vulnerable time in a woman's life. Important Note: This is a very old text, and it doesn't reflect our modern understanding of purity or holiness. It was a practical regulation based on ancient beliefs about hygiene and ritual purity. In short, this verse describes a period of impurity that needed to be dealt with in ancient times through a specific process – it’s about dealing with bodily fluids considered unholy. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of Leviticus? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage? Answer any specific questions you have about it?